POSE HARD, CUM HUGE AND WIN BIG"!
JK ROHER TAKES HIS FIFTH JUNIOR CLASS WIN!
In the Junior Dorms watching training videos after his latest win,
JK Roher answered questions for us at the IFNB Report, noting:
"I came to the BeefBoy to do three things: flex hard, cum huge and win big."
The controversy to let an IFNB pro compete in an amateur event revolved around the fears that he would win it all. Well, those officials who voiced that concern are being proven right when JK Roher took his fifth win in a row in the Junior Classes. (Learn about IFNB Pro JK Roher by clicking here.)
Barring a massive error in the sixth regular contest, Roher is a lock for the coveted Finals Round as the Junior Class Overall. All Roher has o do in the sixth competition is show up.
"He doesn't even have to pop a load!" his coach told us. "He could come in as low as tenth and still qualify for the Overall title." His coaching staff told us that he may, indeed, not cum at all, and save himself for the finals.
However, when we asked Roher if he would withhold his cum, he merely smiled and answered coyly:
"You can not stop a lion from roaring, because he is made to roar. You can not stop a bull from charging because he is made to charge. My coaches tell me to not cum, but that is what I am made to do!"
Roher's confidence is higher than ever, and his normally astounding arrogance is bolder than normal. Fans are loving his swagger and cockiness at the event, as it is the sign of a true alpha winner. When we arrived in the Junior Dorms to interview him after his fifth win, we could barely get him to stop posing. When we asked if he thought he could beat the determined Perrod for the overall, he told us smugly:
"I came to the BeefBoy to do three things: flex hard, cum huge and win big."
Apparently, he is doing exactly that!
DO YOU THINK ROHER WILL TAKE IT IN THE FINALS?
POST YOUR THOUGHTS ON ROHER BELOW.
I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH ROHER'S TOP PLACING AS I'VE NOT SEEN THE COMPETITORS HE WAS UP AGAINST, HOWEVER, HIS GENETICS MAY BE A PROBLEM AS HE PROGRESSES AS HIS NARROW FRAME, UNLIKE THAT OF THE SHW COLLEGIATE WINNER FOR EXAMPLE, COULD PUT HIM AT A DISADVANTAGE. IN NON-NAKED BODYBUIDLER COMPETITONS IT WOULD BE A SERIOUS FLAW. GOOD OVERALL BALANCED DEVELOPEMENT JUST THE SAME.
ReplyDeleteYou are right; over time he could be limited.
DeleteMike Tarber, the superheavyweight you mentioned, is a much thicker build. He doesn't dial it in like Roher, but I agree he has a larger future ahead of him.
This is the subtlety of this sport, however. While it is not all body nor all cock, but rather a combination, it is rather hard to predict the future. Many amazingly built men just don't have the cock to match nor the performance to really support the power of their physique. They often go pro, then get stuck. Meanwhile, as presentation is so much more weighted in naked bodybuilding, a guy who might have otherwise gotten stuck based on his body alone can instead advance based on his ability to pose and present - both his muscle and cock - and be awarded via his athletics, rather than just his "equipment."
This is one aspect that naked bodybuilding emphasizes MUCH better than non-naked bodybuilding. Non-naked bodybuilding has gotten so much more focused on the body as a static entity. Non-naked bodybuilding used to reward those who presented well - who were real competitors. Now it has become just "what you got" as opposed to also "how you use it." Naked bodybuilding re-places the emphasis on one's abilities, and not just on one's possessions. Which is the opportunity guys like Roher need to get ahead.
So, as always, speaking as a fellow competitor, I agree with your non-naked assessment of Roher's base physique. Yet we have a sport that looks at his performance as well - and not just his cock, but how he poses and presents. This may be he edge he plays as his body may limit him over time.
DON'T DISAGREE BUT EVEN IN NAKED BODYBUILDING THE COCK WITH ITS BALANCE AND PERFORMANCE IS BEST WHEN ATTACHED TO A DENSLY MUSCULAR PHYSIQUE. IT'S GREAT AS A TIE BREAKER WHEN TWO PHYSIQUES ARE SEEMINGLY EQUAL IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT. HOWEVER, IT SHOULD NOT BE AN OVERRIDING, UNDERLINE OVERRIDING, FACTOR FOR A PHYSIQUE THAT IS PROPORTIONALY WELL DEVELOPED BUT MAY BE GENETICALLY INFERIOR. THAT'S NO DIFFERENT THAN NON - NAKED BODYBUILDING, NAKED BODYBUILDERS JUST HAVE AN ADDITIONAL BOD PART TO INCLUDE IN THE JUDGING. WE'LL SEE, OVER TIME, HOW THE JUDGES VIEW IT.
DeleteI agree. I have been following this longer than you, and what I have seen is that 90% of the time judges take the overall picture, and the only time they veer from that is in the posing (which does NOT just mean cockwork, but actual presentation - of which cockwork is a part).
DeleteI have watched the guys with balance and freakish size and shape get ahead, and the guys who are just a big cock or who do not evolve stay behind.
In other words: I think your interests are WELL represented in the IFNB, even though there will always be outliers and unusual examples of the opposite.
The judges do NOT favor cock over body any more than they favor body over cock. They take the WHOLE boy in - both in shape, scale, and size as well as in performance and presentation.
My bet is Roher - with his obsession with muscle and his drive and aggression - will find a way to deny genetic predispositions and push way beyond the limitations that may seem to be there lying in wait for him . . . I have faith in the boy, and have seen some AMAZING things among these bad ass pros to know Roher will follow in their footsteps!